These readings helped me put a word to my
most used reading strategy, "monitoring." I am a good reader, I enjoy
reading when I have the time, and I like my books to make sense. There is
usually a point in time where I have lost focus and I realize I have no idea
what just happened in the last two pages. A this moment, I ask myself “What’s
happening?” and if I can’t answer that question, I go back to a spot in the
text where I know what is happening and then re-read.
There are also other strategies that I never
had specific words for that I know I employ. I am capable of activating
background knowledge and do so when I can. Recalling this previous knowledge
then allows me to make connections (self-to-text, text-to-text, text-to-world)
and build off of my schema. I use visualizing to a great extent and these
images will play out in my head until my monitoring begins and I realize I have
missed the last two pages due to my visualizing. I will use repairing when I search for a word
after I become stuck unfamiliar vocabulary and I cannot use context clues to
infer meaning. Lastly, I use summarizing when I speak to another person about
the book and provide my recommendation.
The “Profiles of Comprehension” was very
insightful on the behaviors of students. I have seen these profiles in the
classroom on a regular basis. The interventions suggested are very thoughtful
and I would like to use these suggestions in my future classroom. The
activities that are given to provide support for these profiles are easy to perform
and sound very beneficial. I believe the most important aspect of these
profiles, is that Applegate emphasizes that no student will always fit just one
profile. A student can go through multiple profiles during the course. Making
adjustments so students can view the material in new ways is critical for their
comprehension.